I’ve been playing around with mercurial as of late as a way to enhance what I know about git and version control in general. These are my in-progress notes.

A lot of things are familiar

  • hg help behaves like git help
  • hg init behaves like git init.
  • hg status behaves like git status.
    • but with more cryptic responses: $ touch newfile && hg status #=> ? newfile
    • no output indicates a clean working directory
    • hg sum tells you the state of the working directory
  • hg add behaves like git add <file>
  • hg commit behaves like git commit.

Revisions, not SHA1s

hg log is similar to git log, with a few important differences.

$ hg log --graph --style=compact
@  2[tip]   3afb761704c7   2014-12-06 11:14 -0500   jesse
|    third commit
o  1   2d9ef30807a4   2014-12-06 11:09 -0500   jesse
|    second commit
o  0   ff70fcdc63f9   2014-12-06 11:07 -0500   jesse
 initial commit

Instead of SHA1 hashes to label commits, mercurial uses revision numbers. This means reverting changes is easy as hg update 1 or hg update 0. The @ symbol indicates which revision your working directory is in, ie git’s HEAD.

Multiple HEADs

hg update feels a bit like git reset, but is less dangerous in terms of its ability to rewrite history.

Edit this Post